Husbands' involvement in contraceptive use: assessing decision-making and support dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61561/ssbgjms.v6i01.36Keywords:
Contraception, Decision-making, Gender-Inequality, Heath EducationAbstract
Introduction: Contraceptive use is critical in family planning, health management, and socioeconomic development. However, gender dynamics, education, and economic factors often influence household decision-making and support systems. Understanding the role of husbands in contraceptive use, including their participation in decisions and financial support, is essential for designing more inclusive reproductive health policies. This study examines the involvement of husbands in contraceptive practices among couples.
Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted from March 2000 to June 2000 at a purposively selected slum of Dhaka in Shaymoli, Adabar, and Agargaon and some sections of a government colony to evaluate husbands' involvement in contraceptive use, focusing on assessing decision-making and support dynamics. A total of 300 participants were selected using a purposive sampling technique. Data analysis was done on a computer using SPSS.
Result: The study revealed that most respondents were between 20 and 30 years old, while husbands were predominantly 35 and 44. A significant proportion of respondents (36%) were illiterate, compared to 25.3% of husbands. The majority (43.3%) had a monthly income between Tk 3,000-3,999. Contraceptive use was high (91.3%), with female methods (76.29%) being more common than male methods (23.71%). Women primarily made contraceptive decisions (81.3%), with limited husband involvement (18.7%). Husbands’ education significantly influenced decision-making, whereas income levels showed no significant correlation. In most cases, husbands provided financial support for travel and contraceptives.
Conclusion: This study emphasizes the limited involvement of husbands in contraceptive decision-making, with most decisions made by women independently. Higher male education correlated with greater participation, while economic factors showed no significant effect. Enhancing male engagement and shared responsibility in family planning is essential to achieving more balanced reproductive health practices.
References
1. Park K. Park’s Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine: 15th edition. India: M/s. Banarsidas Bhanot, 1997: 451.
2. Hemes. K. Norman. Medical history of contraception. New York. GUMUT PRESS, INC,1963.
3. Kabir M, Rob A.K.U, Ahmed K.S, Saha U.R. Difference between husbands and wives in attitudes toward contraceptive use and fertility preferences. Extended analysis, Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, 1993-94: 213-234.
4. Faisal A.J, Ahmed J. “Role of male as the user of contraceptive methods” in “Male involvement in family planning: A Challenge for the National Programme Workshop” (Proceeding). NIPORT, GTZ, The Population Council and AVSC International, June 1996: 45-51
5. Becker S. Couples and Reproductive Health: A review of couple’s studies. Studies in Family Planning Nov/Dec 1996; 27(6): 291-306.
6. Health Benefits of Family Planning. WHO,1995.
7. Piet-Pelon N.J, Kabir A.A. “Highlights of regional male involvement family planning programmes” in “Male involvement in family planning: A Challenge for the National Programme Workshop” (Proceeding). NIPORT, GTZ, The Population Council and AVSC International, June 1996: 65-79.
8. Directorate of Family Planning, NIPORT, Population Council. Getting men involved in family planning: Experiences from the innovative program, final report, April 1998.
9. NIPORT, Mitra and Associates and Macro International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, 1996-97.
10. Barnet B. Family planning use often a family decision. (Abstract). NETWORK.1998 Summer; 18(4): 10-1,13-4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
